High School Accreditation ReportThe first is this 82-page report from the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC) on their recent accreditation visit to the high school. While the report does not indicate what the accreditation status rating will be (that should be announced by April), it does give a pretty detailed view on the educational environment at the school, both pro and con.
Thursday's Salem News story, "BHS 'very good' with room to improve" focuses primarily on this report, and principal Sean Gallagher's overview presentation on it, and presents a generally positive view of the school, but points out plenty of areas in need of improvement:
The full report expands upon this latter point, and ties it to the budget woes the district has faced over the past few years, and the extra crunch the overall budget is under because of the manner in which the high school was funded by the city:The report praised teachers for "promoting the well-being and learning of students" and said the school does "an excellent job in celebrating school successes." But it also said the quality of instruction "varies widely" from the higher-level to lower-level classes. Evaluators praised Principal Sean Gallagher for articulating a "clear vision" for the school but said that vision "has not been clearly communicated to the faculty."
The report also said the high school is "unable to provide enough up-to-date textbooks to meet students' needs."
The community and the district’s governing body does not ensure an adequate and dependable source of revenue to provide and maintain appropriate school programs, personnel, services, facilities, equipment, technology support, materials, and supplies for student learning. Over the last three fiscal cycles, the school district budget was level funded in fiscal year (FY) 2009/2010 and reduced by over 2.4 million dollars in FY 2010/11. The total operating budget for the current fiscal year is 44.6 million dollars.While the purpose of the report is to point out areas in need of improvement, it's summary statement doesn't seem to indicate that the accreditation should be in jeopardy (it's current status is primarily the result of the condition of the old building). It also seems to support Gallagher's statement that the school is "very good" but strives to be "great"
The new high school building project was funded without city debt exclusion, forcing the school district to absorb about one million more per year in future costs to pay for the renovation. The agreement made with the city to procure funding for the school building project established a maximum cap on any total annual budget increase requested by the school committee. Operating expense increases in areas such as utilities and staff benefits have led to corresponding decreases in areas such as school supplies, textbooks,and equipment. Textbooks used in many departments are often outdated and in some cases insufficient in number, requiring the restriction of such textbooks to classroom use.
Overall, the efforts that Beverly High School is making to provide its students with a quality educational experience is commendable. The new facility will greatly increase the likelihood that the school will be able to meet the needs of all of its students. When all members of the school community understand the need to make achievement by all students of the school-wide expectations the major focus at Beverly High School and make a concerted commitment to do what is necessary to accomplish this, what is a very good school will become even better.3/16 UPDATE: The Salem News has more detailed coverage of the NEASC report in today's edition, as does the Beverly Citizen.
Budget Survey ResultsThe second report is Superintendent Galinski's presentation on the results of the recent Budget Shortfall Survey.
As we wrote when the survey was first posted, just the reading of the questions was a pretty good roadmap to some of the plans being considered by the administration. Due to the method by which these types of large restructuring proposals were sprung on the community in the past, many fear that an announcement is imminent, but Dr. Galinski stated clearly Wednesday night that these changes were NOT being considered for next year, but were more long-term in nature.
While some of the results were interesting, many feel that the questions were grouped and worded arbitrarily and lacked context, making the results inconclusive.
Some of the comments from members of the Committee seemed to support this view, with some questioning the use of the term "neighborhood schools," when true neighborhood schools havn't existed for quite some time, and wondering how people defined "small" class sizes. Galinski even acknowledged that some questions resulted in competing priorities being chosen by the respondents, and would require further study.
Nonetheless a few points stood out as interesting.
- Respondents (Parents, Staff and other Comminitee Members) all rated Art & Music and the Kindergarten program at the district's most important programs.
- Parents and other community members rated "small classes" as the most important "resource" while teachers and staff rated "Salary and Benefits" number one.
- All groups were clearly against moving 5th graders to the middle school.
- When given a list of priorities in any future redistricting plan, all groups rated "quality of education" first and "open enrollment" last.